Open or named?

Open Perils vs Named Perils: What's the Difference?

Open perils cover everything not excluded; named perils only what's listed. The wording your policy uses matters.

Your policy is the only source of truth

Get a precise answer for your exact policy

Generic answers don't pay claims. PolicyPal reads your policy wording in seconds and tells you, in one sentence, whether you're covered.

Upload your policy$7 per analysis · No subscription · PDF only

The short answer

Open perils (HO-3/HO-5 in the US) cover any cause of loss not explicitly excluded — broader. Named perils only cover causes listed in the policy — narrower and usually cheaper.

How to tell which you have

Look at the structure cover wording. 'All risks of physical loss except those excluded' = open. A specific bulleted list = named.

Frequently asked

Which is better for contents?
Open perils, if you can afford the premium. Named misses many real-world losses.
Is HO-5 worth the upgrade from HO-3?
Often yes — it extends open-perils cover to contents (HO-3 only covers structure that way).

Your policy is the only source of truth

Stop guessing. Check your actual policy.

Generic answers don't pay claims. PolicyPal reads your policy wording in seconds and tells you, in one sentence, whether you're covered.

Upload your policy$7 per analysis · No subscription · PDF only